Saturday, January 25, 2020
Analysis Of National Interest And Foreign Policy Politics Essay
Analysis Of National Interest And Foreign Policy Politics Essay At the heart of any national interest lays its security, in order states to survive they must protect their security, by any means available to them, the treats to national security can be both external and internal. External treats can include any treat that comes from competing nations and enemies of the state. Internal treats can come from groups with political aims of overthrowing the government, even though the aim of security in national interest doesnt always mean protecting the states territorial boundaries, nor the repulsion of foreign attack. In some cases nation may be required to sacrifice some of its territory, or renounce some of its claims, in order to preserve another, more intrinsic element of the state(Orme,5). States create economic developments by promoting foreign investment, modernising their economy from low-income based economy to high-income based economy, such as building infrastructure, investing in technology, research and development. Without social development economic development cant be fulfilled. States invest in education, access to public health, gender equalities, and civil societies. States dont further their national interest by becoming self centred , in this day and age where the world is a global village states cant afford to ignore the rest of the world, therefore states look far beyond their states and consider other factors that are important to their national interest, economically, socially and politically. The above mentioned characteristics identifies national interest of a state and its components, the question is how do states promote their national interest?, states promote their national interest through foreign policy, thus foreign policy is the sum of an actors goals and purposive actions in global politics. Foreign policy consists of those discrete official actions of the authoritative decision makers of a nations government, or their agents, which are intended by the decision makers to influence the behaviour of international actors external to their own polity. In practice, foreign decisions are not made by single leaders in isolation, but it is a cumulative process that involves, interest groups, domestic issues, bureaucracies, leadership, and so on. Therefore foreign policy is the means and national interest is the end. Countries conduct their foreign policy through many channels that are available to them, namely diplomacy, force, track11 diplomacy, communication, and so on. Countries when shaping their foreign policy take into account many factors that are important, such as, geography, the size of the population, the level of economic development, political tradition, domestic environment, internal environment, military capability, and national character. Diplomacy: Diplomacy is the main channel through which foreign policy is conducted, diplomacy has existed throughout the history from the ancient Greeks to the African tribal systems all used diplomacy to solve disputes and to defuse potential conflicts. Diplomacy involves negotiation to manage relations among states. It is perhaps the most prominent tool in foreign policy available to actors for managing disputes. Diplomats in foreign offices and ministries often argue exhausting peaceful efforts to achieve goals before resorting to war and try to achieve compromises with adversaries to prevent conflict(Mansbach, Rafferty :363). Countries that have the means such as the United States appoint ambassadors virtually anywhere in the world to represent their interest, poor countries that dont have the means rely on their UN ambassador to meet and discuss issues in New York with other UN ambassadors from all over the world. Over time diplomats come and go but countries maintain diplomatic missions abroad. The role of the diplomats is to assess their countrys objectives given its actual and potential power to gauge other states objectives in light to their power. Diplomats must also assess the extent to which their countrys objectives are compatible with those of other countries and then decide whether to use persuasion, compromise, or treat of force to pursue their countrys end. (Mansbach, Rafferty: 365). Force: If diplomacy fails then the use of force is the last resort. It is the choice of last resort because of the destructive nature of wars, on humans and economies. The following are the three strategies for managing conflict that require the treat to use military force; defence, deterrence, and compliance. Each of these involve to a different degree, using force in a different way. Defence is to repel an attack, defence may be passive or active, passive defence employs civil defences, bunkers, hardening of weapons systems, and increasing weaponry systems. While active defence involves directing military force against a potential or an actual attacker and may include missile defence, pre-emptive and preventive war. In pre-emptive strike state anticipates an imminent attack and strikes first to gain the upper-hand, whereas in preventive strike it anticipates an attack in the distant future, and therefore attacks the adversary before they gain the capability to strike. Deterrence is to prevent an enemy to attack in the first place. Deterrence is less expensive than defence, because it may not always lead to war, but the threat of war may influence an adversary to take a different course of action, rather than confrontation. Actors usually exercise the three Cs of deterrence, namely communication, capabilities and credibility, which means actors communicate to their adversary and inform them the path they have chosen will indeed lead to conflict, and demonstrate their capabilities if they dont change course, third the treats must be credible. Compliance unlike deterrence, which involves the passive use of force, compliance also called coercive diplomacy, uses limited force to make an actor alter its behaviour or undo certain thing already done. Successful compliance convinces an enemy of the following. There is urgency about complying with the demand to alter its behaviour The coercing actor is more highly motivated than the opponent; and The consequences of staying the course will be escalation and still greater pain for the adversary. This is called bargaining in simple terms, if the enemy fails to comply, the coercing actor must decide whether to back down or intensify the use of force. This is precisely what the United States and its allies are doing in relation to Iran, to convince the Iranian regime to abandon their nuclear ambitions. Track II diplomacy: States use un-official channels to conduct their foreign policy and further their national interest, these include cultural exchanges, people to people movements, conducting this type of diplomacy states show that their government is not hostile to the others. For example some may argue that if the line that divides the Indian sub-continent was removed and the follow of people is allowed between Pakistan and India that would have reduced a lot of the tension between the two nuclear armed nations and could create an atmosphere of understanding, co-operation, interaction and mutual respect. Communication: Communication is a major instrument of foreign policy, it can be in the form of propaganda, or what is called external publicity, the purpose of propaganda is to inform people and governments abroad of the policies, achievements, institutions, and values of the state concerned and to convert international public opinion, as far as possible, to its own point of view (Bandyopadhyay: 24). For example United States uses Voice of America to broadcast their messages, in many different languages around the globe. Other components that contribute the making of foreign policy are Geography and Size: shaping foreign policy states consider their geographic locations, and also the size of their population. Level of economic development: states take into account when shaping their foreign policy according to their economic capabilities. Political tradition: how states conduct their foreign policy is dictated by the political tradition of that state Domestic environment: International environment: Military strength: military capability is the ultimate decision to go to war. National character: In considering all these factors mentioned above. Foreign policy is the means in which national interest has to be promoted, and according to the realist, the success and failure of foreign policy must be judged, by, if the national interest of the state was promoted. Realist argue, the nature of international politics, revolves around power, in a self help environment; states seek to further their national interest by acquiring sufficient military capabilities, to deter attacks by potential enemies, any actor in international politics their aim is to demonstrate their power, or to maintain their power, or to further their power, with power actors can only maintain their position and influence by it. Thus the priority of every state is to promote national interest and for that matter to acquire power. I agree with the realist point of view when it comes to power and prestige, Americans dominate the rest of the world not because they have the largest population in the world, but they are the strongest nation, economically, militarily, technologically and the US president is often referred to as the most powerful man in the world. American influence in the world touches every part of this globe, shaping policies, furthering their interest.
Friday, January 17, 2020
Bureaucracy is No Longer Appropriate Today
Bureaucracy, first proposed by Weber, was once considered as the best form of administration, coordination and control (Stazyk and Goerdel 2011). It was generally adopted by many large social organizations and gradually became their mode of administration (Adler 1999). During the initial period of bureaucracy, it made great contribution to the proper organizing of large social or corporate system through specialization of roles, standardization of procedures and coordination of employees (Balle 1999). However, with time going by, the shortages and problems inside bureaucracy were exposed.It was revised and improved by many people. A model called post-bureaucracy was proposed to avoid and revise the disadvantage of bureaucracy (Johnson et al. 2009). The aim of this essay is to discuss the major advantages and disadvantages of bureaucratic systems in the past and the present. This essay argues that bureaucracies are definitely not appropriate in workplaces today for effective and effic ient management. At first, this essay will give an appropriate definition of bureaucracy and illuminate who has contributed to its development by referring Dwyer (2005) and Hodgson (2004).After that, based on the research of Balle (1999), Adler (1999), Hodgson (2004),Walton (2005), Sorensen (2007), Dwyer (2005) , Hales (2002), Stazyk and Goerdel (2011), this essay will critically analyze the advantages and disadvantages of bureaucracy in the past and present, and in particular, impacts on managers and employees. Following that, this easy will analyze how bureaucratic management may be viewed differently today from the past by referring Johnson et al. (2009). Whatââ¬â¢s more, this easy will explore the context of management situations.It will also critically analyze whether bureaucracies are appropriate for todayââ¬â¢s management based on the research of Walton (2005) and Hales (2002). At last this essay will sum up the core arguments this essay presents. Definition of bureaucr acy and its development Bureaucracy is a kind of rational organization of management, which is centralized and hierarchically organized. It is characterized by a rigid division of labor, layers of authority, impersonal relationships and formalistic rules and procedures (Dwyer 2005).The historical process of bureaucracy theory, from proposal to evolution, was integrated with the contribution of numerous theorists and practitioners. In the early 20th century, Weber first proposed his ideal type of bureaucracy (Adler 1999). His idea laid the foundation of organization theory. The ideal type of bureaucracy had a profound effect on the way large social organizations organized. It helped large-scale organizations avoid chaos and assure efficiency.However, as an ideal model, many scholars criticized, revised and improved Weberââ¬â¢s ideal type of bureaucracy and made their own contribution to the development of it (Dwyer 2005; Hodgson 2004). For example, Taylor founded the Scientific Ma nagement School and it emphasizes maximum productivity and compact division of labor (Dwyer 2005). Mayo began and developed human relations school and it emphasizes the free of constraints of bureaucracy (Dwyer 2005). Heckscher proposed post-bureaucracy and postulated specific difference between the traditional bureaucracy and the post-bureaucratic model (Hodgson 2004).All these schools above, as well as many other advanced theories and approaches, have contributed to the development of bureaucracy. The inherent advantages and disadvantages of bureaucratic system in the past and the present will be discussed as follows. Advantages of bureaucracy Bureaucracy provides a good way to deal with large organizations. In the past, organizations were lack of theoretical guidelines of management. Balle (1999) claims that duplication of labor, low level of resources utilization and inefficiency of work existed in large-scale organizations before the proposal of bureaucratic management.At prese nt, many large organizations still organize their management in the form of bureaucracy to avoid chaos (Adler 1999). Bureaucracy provides a series of documents that describe the working procedures as well as rigid rules and regulations to make organizations run properly (Hodgson 2004). Even in todayââ¬â¢s organization, documents and manuals are provided to make employees know exactly their roles. Organizations operate as a machine. Managers give orders while employees act as components and parts of the machine with the guidance of bureaucratic management.They work cooperatively, concertedly and thus effectively. According to the guidance, employees know exactly what they should do and managers would have a chance of supervising everyone in the company. For example, the long-lasting feudal model has proved the advantage of bureaucratic system to manage such a large whale (Balle 1999). The effective control of organizations and efficient use of resources make large-scale production possible. Specialization is another feature of bureaucratic organizations as every employee is allocated to a particular task to perform.In the past, it was human resources not machines that constructed the basic productive force in organizations. So it is of great importance to deploy the human resources (Johnson et al. 2009). Even today, employees in the large organizations have clear assignment of work and responsibility. Bureaucratic management emphasizes the clear division of work and specific boundaries to responsibilities. So employees can concentrate more on his or her specialized trade and learn more about it (Balle 1999). The result is more, better and cheaper productions.For example, like a flow production, employees just focus on their own part of work and need not take care of others. A production is completed when all the work of employee is combined. The coordination of employees and explicit division of work will increase the speed of production and save more time ( Adler 1999). The result is the improvement of the efficiency of the production system. Whatââ¬â¢s more, with the clear awareness of the role of employees, managers can properly manage employees and allocate resources. Then the effectiveness of management can be improved.Bureaucratic system needs fewer individuals to make strategic decisions based on its hierarchical structure and decision-making time can be shorter. Nowadays, quick response to the market and rapid decision-making are possible because of the hierarchical structure of bureaucratic system. The hierarchical structure is like a pyramid with employees on its bottom and managers on its top (Hales 2002). In the past, in traditional organizations many relevant individuals took part in the decision-making meeting. The meeting might be held one round and another to reach a common agreement.It is a waste of time and may be inefficient. In contrast, fewer individuals from the top of pyramid are involved in making strategic de cision with the bureaucratic management (Stazyk and Goerdel 2011). This will shorten the decision-making time and free the organizations of the risk of missing opportunities. As a consequence, the response time to the market is reduced and the timeliness of production is improved (Adler 1999). In this way the efficiency of production can be improved. However, as an ideal type of mode, bureaucracy also has some inherent disadvantages. Disadvantages of bureaucracyBureaucratic organizations are generally found to be rigid and inflexible because employees should strictly abide by the formalized rules, regulations and documents. Nowadays, the society is changing with the time and bureaucratic systems are viewed as red tape and rule proliferation (Stazyk and Goerdel 2011). With the changing conditions in the marketplace or industry, organizations constrained by rigid and inflexible rules and regulations can find themselves less able to fit the rapid changing environment (Walton 2005). The change of rules and regulations may be much slower than the variation of marketing or industrial environment.Much of the urgencies may fail to be dealt with because of the constraint of rigid and inflexible rules and regulations. The result is an inefficient management. In the past, to make the large-scale organization operate normally, the human side of things is ignored and rules and regulations are emphasized. But nowadays, people-oriented management emphasizes the empowerment and autonomy instead of rules and regulations (Dwyer 2005). Bureaucratic organizations may discourage creativity and innovation because employees must perform the task according to a set of rigid procedures.As the key factors to compete with various counterparts, creativity and innovation are emphasized more today than the past in organizations (Hales 2002). But to bureaucratic organizations, rigid or even outdated rules and regulations place so many unnecessary limits on employees (Adler 1999). They can h ardly think and act of their own. When employees confront problems that need a new solution, their new ideas may be prevented by the restrictiveness of bureaucracy. Whatââ¬â¢s more, in bureaucratic systems employees are lack of initiative, passion and sharing of ideas. This will lead to a lack of creativity and innovation.These two factors are of significant importance for organizations to survive and keep the core competitiveness in such a rapid changing environment (Sorensen 2007). Without creativity and innovation, organizations can no longer achieve the quality goals and enhance the ability to survive and complete effectively in the changing business environment. The result is the ineffectiveness of management. Impersonality is the feature of bureaucracy and it emphasizes a mechanical way of performing task. In the past, organizations needed management based on rational and impersonal rules and regulations.The rules and regulations have been legally established to minimize co st and maximize control (Hales 2002). The result was that employees worked like robots according to the impersonal rules and regulations. They had no emotions and belongingness of organizations. Thus their attitudes and mental dispositions may be influenced by bureaucracy (Sorensen 2007). Nowadays, organizations emphasize more on employeeââ¬â¢s needs and emotions, rather than impersonal rules and regulations. Organizations that stick to impersonality may lead to dehumanization, whatââ¬â¢s more, the friction between employees and manages (Dwyer 2005).The result is the depression of employeeââ¬â¢s personality and weak belongingness to their workplace. They may do their job without full of passion or even conflict with the order of managers. This will lead to an effectiveness of management. After the discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of bureaucratic management in the past and present, discussion below will analyze the differences of bureaucratic management toda y from the past. Difference of bureaucracy nowadays and in the past Bureaucratic management is different today from the past.Firstly, Organizations emphasize more on quick response and less hierarchical structure than a set of rigid procedures. To keep up with the changing business environment, much of the unnecessary rigid and inflexible rules and regulations must be changed or removed (Hodgson 2004). Empowerment and responsible autonomy of employees are needed rather than the rigid procedures (Johnson et al. 2009). The result is a remarkable improvement of efficiency in management.Secondly, creativity and innovation are the core competitiveness for organizations to compete with their counterparts andà therefore those limits of bureaucratic systems on employees should be eliminated (Hales 2002). Employees are encouraged to propose or experiment their new ideas regardless of the constraint of rigid procedures because rigid procedures may bring effectiveness to organizations (Stazy k and Goerdel 2011). Last but not least, human-based management has been widely accepted in organizations and the impersonality of bureaucracy is no longer encouraged. Employees can feel the care and warmth of human-based management and improve their belongingness and the well-being of the organization.The result is more hard-working employees and the improvement of effective management. After discussing the differences of bureaucratic management today from the past, an analysis of bureaucracyââ¬â¢s inappropriateness for todayââ¬â¢s management will be given as follows. Bureaucracyââ¬â¢s appropriateness for todayââ¬â¢s management The context of management situations is different from past and bureaucracy is definitely no longer appropriate today. It is true that bureaucracy made great contribution to the progress of management when it was first proposed by Weber (Walton 2005).But with the development of society, the disadvantages of bureaucracy gradually appeared. Nowaday s organizations call for flexible and humanized rules and regulations, quick response to the changing environment and employees, creativity and innovation and belongingness of employees (Hales 2002). In other words, organizations need the effective and efficient management that can make them survive and compete in this rapidly changing world. All of these above are conflicted with bureaucracy. So bureaucracy is no longer appropriate for todayââ¬â¢s management. However, there are still a lot of places can be learnt from bureaucratic system.Conclusion In conclusion, bureaucracies are definitely not appropriate in workplaces today for effective and efficient management. The following statements sum up the finding of this essay to support the conclusion. Firstly, the rigid and inflexible rules and regulations of bureaucratic system often result in a failure of quick response to the changing environment. It may lead to an inefficient management especially for large-scale organizations . Secondly, creativity and innovation may be discouraged by a set of rigid procedures of bureaucratic system and therefore lead to an ineffective management.Thirdly, employees perform task in a mechanical way according to the impersonal rules of bureaucratic system. The result is that employees can hardly feel the belongingness to their workplace. This may lead to a failure of work and an ineffective management. All of these above demonstrate that bureaucracy is not appropriate for todayââ¬â¢s management. However, there are still shining points that can be learnt from bureaucratic management. When dealing with the management of large-scale organizations, bureaucracy and modern management methods can be mixed to insure a better control of organization and an effective and efficient management.
Thursday, January 9, 2020
The Economic Impacts Of The Economy - 1145 Words
Today, there is a noteworthy and consistent fear of a future recession within our barely stable economy. A recession happens when the economy cannot produce an equal amount of output as input and livelihood are failing for six month timeframe. This is because of various elements: individuals purchasing less, a decline in processing plant generation, developing unemployment, a drop in individual wage, or a horrible securities exchange. These components including lack, decision, and opportunity expense are the reasons that an economy is considered in a subsidence and how something like this happens. One fundamental effect on what happens in and to the economy is the factor of decision. The economy cannot thrive at its own; it need consumersâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Keeping the end goal to attempt to recover misfortunes, the costs of assets that the producers need to buy to make items will rise. This generally will divert from the whole steadiness of the financial framework. Short age/scarcity results in exchange-offs which then prompt an open door expense. Due to the shortage of items, producers must spend more to get required materials, which constrains them to raise the costs that the customers must pay, which prompts the following point: the decision of the consumer. As expressed some time recently, the economy keeps running by the choices that the customer makes; decisions, whether to purchase or not to purchase. The decision to perform a sure activity incorporates the decision of not performing a sure activity. The decision to purchase a food from one fast food franchise incorporates the decision of not purchasing fast food from another one. Individual decision is incorporated into both the producer and consumer classification. The producers must settle on a choice on which asset to utilize, which items will be made, sum that will be made, the amount it will cost, and where it will be sold. Then again, consumers additionally have decisions to make, for instance, what to purchase, when to purchase, the amount to purchase, and where to get it. These variables of individual decision likewise overflow into the domain of chance expense, or what one must surrender keeping in mind the end goal to get an item.
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Assassin Bugs in the Garden
Assassin bugs get their name from their predatory habits. Gardeners consider them beneficial insects because their voracious appetites for other bugs keep pests under control. All About Assassin Bugs Assassin bugs use piercing, sucking mouthparts to feed and have long, slender antennae. A short, three-segmented beak distinguishes Reduviids from other true bugs, which generally have beaks with four segments. Their heads are often tapered behind the eyes, so they look like they have a long neck. Reduviids vary in size, from just a few millimeters in length to over three centimeters. Some assassin bugs seem rather bland in brown or black, while others sport elaborate markings and brighter colors. The front legs of assassin bugs are designed for catching prey. When threatened, assassin bugs may inflict a painful bite, so be careful handling them. Classification of Assassin Bugs Kingdom ââ¬â AnimaliaPhylum ââ¬â ArthropodaClass ââ¬â InsectaOrder ââ¬â HemipteraFamily ââ¬â Reduviidae The Assassin Bug Diet Most assassin bugs prey on other small invertebrates. A few parasitic Reduviids, like the well-known kissing bugs, suck the blood of vertebrates, including humans. The Assasin Bug Life Cycle Assassin bugs, like other Hemipterans, undergo incomplete metamorphosis with three stagesââ¬âegg, nymph, and adult. The female lays clusters of eggs on plants. Wingless nymphs hatch from the eggs and molt several times to reach adulthood in about two months. Assassin bugs living in colder climates usually overwinter as adults. Special Adaptations and Defenses Toxins in the assassin bugs saliva paralyze its prey. Many have sticky hairs on their front legs, which help them grasp other insects. Some assassin bug nymphs camouflage themselves with debris, from dust bunnies to insect carcasses. Assassin bugs do whatever it takes to catch a meal. Many employ specialized behaviors or modified body parts designed to fool their prey. One termite-hunting species in Costa Rica uses the dead termite carcasses as bait to attract live ones, then pounces on the unsuspecting insect and eats it. Certain assassin bugs in southeast Asia will stick their hairy front legs in tree resin, and use it to attract bees. Range and Distribution of Assassin Bugs A cosmopolitan family of insects, assassin bugs live throughout the world. They are particularly diverse in the tropics. Scientists describe 6,600 distinct species, with over 100 types of assassin bugs living in North America.
Tuesday, December 24, 2019
The Increase College Tuition Rates - 936 Words
College is an institution or establishment that provides higher education or specialized professional and vocational training. College students in the United States are blest with several opportunities to help further their college carrier at least beyond as associate degree, alas children in developing countries such as Cameroon faces an uphill battle to earn a college degree due to high tuition, poor transportation low technology and inflexible college schedules. The increase college tuition rates in Cameroon, have caused many parents to consider sending their children especially the male child to technical schools, rather than a four year college. Due to the unsupportive nature of the government towards college education, the tuition cost rest entirely on the familyââ¬â¢s income. This has made earning a college degree a priority for the wealthy. According to Cameroon tribune, ââ¬Å"Cameroon college tuition rates have increased over 75% over the past two decades thereby increas ing the illiteracy in low income familiesâ⬠(Fred Thompson) meanwhile in the United States, the government encourages her students to pursue a college degree by providing scholarships, financial aid and loans to her students of merit. This has helped reduced the burden of college tuition and embolden college students to pursue their degrees. The quality of technology in the western world especially in the United States acts as a major motivational factor for students vying for careers in the field of science.Show MoreRelatedThe Tuition Increase Affected Enrollment Rate1473 Words à |à 6 PagesBoard of Ursinus College, raised its tuition from $19,331 to $23,460. This turned out to be a 17.6% increase. Surprisingly, the tuition increase proved to be a positive change for Ursinus College. The college received more than 200 applicants than its previous year (Brickley, Smith and Zimmerman, 2009, p. 110). Other regional institutions such as University of Notre Dame, Bryn Mawr Colle ge and Rice University also experienced a similar trend once they increased their tuition rates (Brickley, SmithRead MoreThe Benefits Of College Tuition1285 Words à |à 6 Pageshaving a college education. Life has gotten much harder and the job market has become more competitive without a four year degree. Having to work two or three jobs and both parents of the home working to put food on the table. People are barely making it with a bachelorââ¬â¢s degree now and are finding themselves needing a masterââ¬â¢s degree to get a better job. College tuition has been increasing at a steady rate. Many students are finding themselves not having equal opportunity to attend college due theRead MoreRaising Tuition Rates1074 Words à |à 4 PagesRaising Tuition Rates Tuition rates have been rising exponentially since ââ¬Å"World War II and the GI Billâ⬠¦Ã¢â¬ which allowed for, ââ¬Å"â⬠¦an explosive increase in the number and proportion of Americans who go to collegeâ⬠(Nathan 148). This change, though largely due to inflation, has been rising past what families can afford to pay, and has led to difficulties for students exiting high school. These difficulties have been seen by campuses, and many already have a plan to help these students pay for the rocketingRead MoreHigher Education At The United States Essay1226 Words à |à 5 Pagesdoors. At the time, college was seen as an exclusive institution, typically reserved for the wealthy elite. In the 1600ââ¬â¢s, a college degree was not necessary to get a decent job and make a living; therefore, there was not a high demand for it. Since then, public opinion and attitudes about higher education have changed significantly. In todayââ¬â¢s job market, a college degree is a requ irement for a majority of positions. Employersââ¬â¢ demand for highly skilled workers continues to increase, leading more peopleRead MoreTuition on the Rise: A Cause of Turmoil1111 Words à |à 5 PagesTuition on the Rise: A Cause of Turmoil Today colleges are growing more and more necessary for attaining a solid path towards a successful career, yet the rapidly increasing cost of tuition is driving students away from their dream of attending college, due to the preposterous amount of money that is now being demanded by colleges across the nation and world as a whole. It is sad to see students being turned away from a successful future due to the money-hungry nature of the universities that dotRead MoreAnalysis Of The College Board s Trends On Higher Education Series1708 Words à |à 7 PagesThe College Board. This report is part of The College Boardââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"Trends in Higher Education Seriesâ⬠that are published annually to provide evidence to policy makers to help aid in decision making. It includes comprehensive data and charts that show that higher education does pay off for graduates. The authors discuss the benefits of higher education both for the individual and for society as a whole. The benefits that are discussed in this report include lifetime earnings, employment rates, jobRead MoreRising College Tuition1114 Words à |à 4 PagesTuition on the Rise: A Cause of Turmoil Today colleges are growing more and more necessary for attaining a solid path towards a successful career, yet the rapidly increasing cost of tuition is driving students away from their dream of attending college, due to the preposterous amount of money that is now being demanded by colleges across the nation and world as a whole. It is sad to see students being turned away from a successful future due to the money-hungry nature of the universities that dotRead MoreCollege : An American Dream Or A Financial Nightmare? Essay1238 Words à |à 5 PagesCollege: An American dream or a financial nightmare? The increases in tuition affecting today s generation of college students remains a subject worth discussing. If you are a college student or plan on pursuing higher education in the years to come, inflation rates directly influence your tuition. It s important to understand why tuition rates continue to exceed inflation. A majority of contributing factors are discussed in this paper. In 2008 the real estate market took a turn forRead MoreThe True Cost Of Education Essay1514 Words à |à 7 Pagesdeciding how much money one will make. But, the cost for oneââ¬â¢s future is increasing. According to College Board, college tuition has been skyrocketing. Presently, the average cost of attending private colleges is $47,405; whereas, in-state schools cost $9,410 and public universities cost $23,893 (Cohen). The cost may vary by where a student attends, and the cost is drastically changing. Although a college education is a dream that most people wish to accomplish, there are obstacles that may get in theRead MoreShould Taxpayers Fund College Tuition? No?909 Words à |à 4 PagesAnna Lis Professor Holly Boux Political Science 103 December 1st, 2015 Should Taxpayers Fund College Tuition? No Dear Representative John Kline, Executive Summary: In the United States, college should remain an accessible opportunity for Americans. Any one who is willing to put in the hard work and effort to make their future better, should be secured an education. A college education is important to one s future and can make a huge difference in how successful someone can become.
Monday, December 16, 2019
Western Media on Pussy Riot Free Essays
The Pussy Riot case has received much attention around the world based on the ethics of the courtââ¬â¢s decision and freedom of expression. The Western media covers the news with facts with truth and consistency, however the information presented shows a favourite towards the side of the Russian band Pussy Riot and against the Putin government. Canadian news such as CTV, CBC and music news like Much Music covered the story with facts of Canadian citizens protesting against Pussy Riotââ¬â¢s two-year sentence to jail. We will write a custom essay sample on Western Media on Pussy Riot or any similar topic only for you Order Now The news has covered people protesting with signs on the street and using bias language against the Russian government. The United Statesââ¬â¢ news has also played a big role in supporting the bandââ¬â¢s fight for freedom. News networks such as CNN, The Wall Street Journal and MTV have covered the news with favoured sided facts for the band. Stories of protest and government officialsââ¬â¢ disapproval of the bandââ¬â¢s sentence have all been published to the western public resulting in citizens fighting for the Russian band. Social networks such as Twitter played a big role in support of the bandââ¬â¢s freedom. Celebrities such as Madonna and Jesse McCartney have also played a role in supporting for the Band. Western world views the court sentencing as a violation of freedom of speech. Western news cover stories with the question what, where, when rather to why. The western news reveals all the facts, however does not stress on the why and the reasons for the Russian courtââ¬â¢s decisions. The readers receive a sense of injustice and wrong when reading news about the Pussy Riotââ¬â¢s case. The western world stresses on freedom and democracy and the Russian court imposed a strict and intolerance towards some sorts of behaviour of expression. The western news had made a positive outcome for the punk band, Pussy Riot. CTV, CBC and Much Music have covered news of Canadian citizens showing support for the Band. News about the bandââ¬â¢s arrest initiated as an arrest for freedom of speech against the Russian government. The news has escalated when the band got sentenced for two years for ââ¬Å"hooliganismâ⬠and religious hatred. News headlines such as ââ¬Å" Imprisoned Pussy Riot face tough life in penal colonyâ⬠by CTV, ââ¬Å"Pussy Riot supporters protest outside consulate in Torontoâ⬠and ââ¬Å"Pussy Riot protest: Conviction of anti-Putin Pussy Riot band sparks worldwide protestsâ⬠by CBC implies a dissent on the Russian courtââ¬â¢s decision. Canadian news reports that the band faces charges for expressing their political views in a democratic country and North America have expressed disapproval to this action. Fans and Canadian supporters of freedom of expression have expressed their disapproval to the world by protesting on the streets, reported by news reports, and using social networks such as Twitter. Much Music has posted pictures of people protesting with signs that declare, ââ¬Å"Punk Rock is not a crimeâ⬠, ââ¬Å"Protect freedom of expressionâ⬠and ââ¬Å"free Pussy Riotâ⬠. These declarations exhibit a definite support for the band and disapproval for the Russian courtââ¬â¢s decision. An example of Canadian news support of the band is CTVââ¬â¢s news report when the band was sentenced to jail Outside the Russian consulate on Bloor Street, about 100 people carried placards and musical instruments, The Canadian Press reported. ââ¬Å"I felt it was so wrong on so many levels I felt I had to do something,â⬠Toronto organizer Lynn Flatley told CTVââ¬â¢s Canada AM Friday morning, before the protest began. ââ¬Å"I had never done anything like this but it was a tipping point for me. â⬠Another protest got underway outside the Russian embassy in Ottawa around 1 p. m. hile another was scheduled to start at 6 p. m. in Montreal. The three band members, two of whom have young children, have been in jail since March when they burst into a cathedral during services and recited a ââ¬Ëpunk prayerââ¬â¢ calling on the Virgin Mary to protect Russian citizens from Vladimir Putin, who was set to win a new term as president at the time. (CTV news: Pussy Riot suppor ters protest conviction outside consulate in Toronto) CTV has published the protesterââ¬â¢s passion about their objection of the bandââ¬â¢s sentence by quoting one of the protesters and describing the event. Also CTV has also mentioned that the band members have young children and describe they have been in jail since March, which implies an unfavourable and detest for the decision of the Court. CTV has insinuated questions of ethics such as ââ¬Å"How can they sentence mothers to jail? â⬠and ââ¬Å" Why is the government against freedom of expression? â⬠Western News also criticised the Russian government since Pussy Riotââ¬â¢s actions was a protest against the Putin government. Much Music has informed Canadian music fans with bias information ââ¬Å"Today Russian punks Pussy Riot received a two-year sentence for ââ¬Å"hooliganism. That, of course, is in the eyes of their countryââ¬â¢s authorities, but what the band were charged with was simply speaking out against a ruthless government. Knowing they werenââ¬â¢t likely to get off, they prepared a new single to help spread the message about the importance of free speech, with the song ââ¬Å"Putin Light Up The Flames . â⬠(Much Music News) Much Music has claimed the Russian government to be ââ¬Å"ruthlessâ⬠because they sentence a band for simply ââ¬Å"speaking outâ⬠. Much Music, and other Canadian news, described the actions of Pussy Riot to be innocent. Pussy Riot has an opinion and their actions have made a controversy against the Russian government. Canada is known to be a democratic and free society and the actions of the Russian government have proven to have strict rules for freedom of expression. Canadian media is playing a big role in getting Canada rallied up against the Russian court. According to the rules of media ethics it is considered unethical for the mediaââ¬â¢s invention of the state, however Canadians are protesting for what they believe is right and that is the right of freedom of expression. The United Statesââ¬â¢ media reports on facts of the event. Similar to Canadian news, the media reports on facts that undermine the Russian courtââ¬â¢s decisions. Americaââ¬â¢s news covered the story about Pussy Riotââ¬â¢s sentencing using words such as ââ¬Å"lack of freedom of speech in Russiaâ⬠and ââ¬Å"restricting the freedom of expression and associationâ⬠(CNN news). CNN covered news with quotations of the people involved on the case. Amnesty International and the UN have gotten involved of the Pussy Riot case with disapproval of the courtââ¬â¢s decision. Americaââ¬â¢s government officials have also gotten involved by declaring protest against the court. CNN had reported all negative quotes and comments of the decision of the court, John Dalhuisen, director of Amnesty Internationalââ¬â¢s Europe and Central Asia Program, urged Russian authorities to overturn the sentence and release the trio unconditionally. He also highlighted recent measures ââ¬Å"restricting the freedom of expression and associationâ⬠introduced after a wave of popular protests that accompanied elections earlier this year. This trial is another example of the Kremlinââ¬â¢s attempts to discourage and delegitimize dissent. It is likely to backfire,â⬠he said. Human Rights Watch also said the women should never have been prosecuted for a hate crime. ââ¬Å"The charges and verdict against the Pussy Riot band members distort both the facts and the law,â⬠Hugh Williamson, the rights groupââ¬â¢s Europe and Central Asia director, said in a statem ent. This paragraph demonstrates that the Russian courtââ¬â¢s decision on sentencing Pussy Riot in jail is absolutely unethical. The band sentenced for ââ¬Å"hooliganismâ⬠and religious hate crime by the Russian court have turned to violation of freedom of expression that violates rules of Human Rights. The Wall Street Journal has reported that the Prime Minister of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, thought the jail sentencing was ââ¬Å"too harshâ⬠and the US Embassy in Moscow has claimed the sentence to be ââ¬Å"disproportionateâ⬠. The USââ¬â¢s media reports their facts with quotes to support and strengthen the authenticity of story and therefore reinforce their disapproval of the Russian court. MTV have reported celebritiesââ¬â¢ protest for the band. Madonna recently performed a riot-styled show wearing a mask, like what Pussy Riot did during their protest, during one of her shows in Moscow. Jesse McCartney had showed support for the band by using Twitter for expression. Celebrities have a huge influence on the world and it is another type of media that shows support towards Pussy Riot. America has a huge influence on the world and that influence may or may not help the bandââ¬â¢s fight for freedom, however Americaââ¬â¢s media definitely implies strong condemnation for Russiaââ¬â¢s government. Western media has shown strong evidence of support for Pussy Riot. The media hasnââ¬â¢t necessarily agreed with the bandââ¬â¢s actions but they definitely do not agree the bandââ¬â¢s sentence to jail for expressing their opinion. North Americans have shown support with protests on the streets and expressing their dissent by using social networks like Twitter. Canadian news reports show pictures and videos of people protests and American news like to use a lot of quotes that express dissent from important world figures. These obviously show a bias support for the band. The Western media fails to cover the side of the Russianââ¬â¢s court and the Churchââ¬â¢s views and to why Pussy Riot was sentenced for 2 years. The band has protested against Putinââ¬â¢s government in a very important orthodox church in Russia that may have led to emotional undertakings. Whether or not the Pussy Riotââ¬â¢s sentence was too harsh or not, the Western media only portrayed a negative effect on the Russian court and a favour for the bandââ¬â¢s freedom of expression. The protest from the Western citizens could have been influence by the Western news or may be influence by peopleââ¬â¢s justice to right of expression since Canada and America embrace the notion of freedom and expression. Current situation The three band members Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Maria Alyokhina, and Yekaterina Samustevich were arrested and threatened with seven yearsââ¬â¢ imprisonment. Their pretrial detention were extended for month, and finally on August 17, 2012, the three members were convicted of hooliganism, and each was sentenced to two years imprisonment. On the appeal hearing on October 1, 2012, Samustevich terminated the representation of her defense attorney because of the conflict of their position. On October 10, Samustevichââ¬â¢s new attorney filed another appeal for Samustevich and argued that Samustevich did not committed hooliganism in the church, because ââ¬Å"cathedral guards had stopped Samutsevich before she had time to get her guitar out of its caseâ⬠. The appeal was accepted and the court released Samutsevich with two years in probation. The court upholds the conviction and sentences for the other two band members. The release of the Pussy Riot video had a significant impact on Russian society and the public debate. Since Russia is a regime that believes imprisonment can repress peopleââ¬â¢s political objection, the Pussy Riotââ¬â¢s case start the public debate of the involvement of the Catholic Church in politics, womenââ¬â¢s right and freedom of expression. However, one of the outstanding factors of the Pussy Riot case was the numerous coverage over social media. According to the media monitor News Effector, 86% of the world mass media had covered the Pussy Riot case. Compare to the Iraq, news reporters had limited and censored information from the government. However, regarding to the Pussy Riot case, the mediaââ¬â¢s establishment had been pushed to a higher lever. Right and left wings, celebrities, and supporters were all engaged in the debate o the Pussy Riot trial. Due to the massive media coverage, Pussy Riot was treated more like a positive propaganda. Western media coverage tend to became more subjective and assertive, they ââ¬Å"failed to mentionâ⬠several crucial points in order to get more supportive comments. ? How to cite Western Media on Pussy Riot, Papers
Saturday, December 7, 2019
The Filter Essay Sample free essay sample
The Filter is a recommendation engine which is used in concurrence with other businessââ¬â¢ web sites for the suggesting of digital media and amusement stuffs. and technological merchandises. Its intent is to analyse the past purchases of the consumer and utilize the informations to propose other stuffs and merchandises that the consumer could probably be interested in. some of which the consumer otherwise would non hold been exposed to. The Filter was non successful on an single footing. but in the concern to concern environment. it has proven itself to be really productive. However. the challenge confronting the Filter now is to recognize its ultimate end of spread outing its service to other industries other than the media. amusement. and engineering. During the groupââ¬â¢s treatment. we besides entertained the inquiry of what factors would be influential in this determination procedure. We concluded that the chief factors would be: consumer behaviour in different markets and the utility or demand of the service in other markets. We will write a custom essay sample on The Filter Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Another inquiry that arose during the treatment was what options were available for the Filter? We all agreed that one option was for the Filter to go more involved in perforating other markets by happening other industries that could utilize its informations roll uping abilities for services other than recommendations of merchandises to buy. The most obvious option suggested was for them to stay within its current market and obtain concern from companies besides the 1s that they presently provide services for. Our groupââ¬â¢s treatment of the picks confronting the Filter included urging some possibilities that they could see in order to ramify out and aim other markets. One possibility is market incursion. Alternatively of Filter offering its services to companies who sell intangible goods. they should offer their services to companies who sell touchable goods. They should market their services to the retail/wholesale industry. For cases. companies such as Walmart could use Filterââ¬â¢s engineering on the Walmart web site. Another is traveling beyond the kingdom of media. amusement. and engineering. and use the recommendation engine for other services such as assorted types of insurance. contraptions dental and medical processs and practicians to call a few. We propose that some ways to implement our recommendations is to: AdvertiseOn societal webs and other popular web sitesMass media ( telecasting. wireless. etc. )Offer IncentivesDiscounts for urging the usage of their servicesDiscounts after a certain sum of purchases The above thoughts are directed more towards bottom line single consumers. To sell to companies. Filter must demo how good their engineering would be to other companies. Filter could demo the new market companies how gross revenues can increase through their engineering due to complimentary purchases. They could demo how gross revenues of companies with their engineering were before they had Filterââ¬â¢s services and after. If gross revenues have greatly increased. other companies would likely see holding Filterââ¬â¢s engineering. We feel that put to deathing these recommendations would do the Filterââ¬â¢s concern environment more contributing for the realisation of their end of marketing its services to other industries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)